Second Language Acquisition: Reconciling Theories
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Main Second Language Acquisition Theories: from Structuralism to Complexity
This article presents a literature review of the main second language acquisition (SLA) theories. It first deals with the very beginning of SLA studies in the middle of the 20 th century, focusing on the studies of Fries and Lado, and then moves on to describe some of the theoretical proposals over the past four decades. Ten theories are briefly described: the structural or behaviorist approach...
متن کاملTheories of language acquisition.
Prior to the advent of generative grammar, theoretical approaches to language development relied heavily upon the concepts ofdifferential reinforcement andimitation. Current studies of linguistic acquisition are largely dominated by the hypothesis that the child constructs his language on the basis of a primitive grammar which gradually evolves into a more complex grammar. This approach presupp...
متن کاملThe Role of Sociolinguistics in Second Language Acquisition
Learning a new language also involves learning a broad system of norms for social relations.This study broadly showed how EFL learners’ speech act is conveyed from their nativecultures when they are communicating in English and demonstrated that there are somepossibilities of cross-cultural misunderstanding when interlocutors are engaged in the speechact of complimenting with native speakers of...
متن کاملA Dynamical System Approach to Research in Second Language Acquisition
Epistemologically speaking, second language acquisition research (SLAR) might be reconsidered from a complex dynamical system view with interconnected aspects in the ecosystem of language acquisition. The present paper attempts to introduce the tenets of complex system theory and its application in SLAR. It has been suggested that the present dominant traditions in language acquisition research...
متن کاملSecond Language Acquisition
Speaking a second language (L2) means having acquired a new inventory of phonemes (speech sounds), new words, and new inflectional and syntactic rules. Because this new knowledge must be stored somewhere in the brain, it does not require neuroimaging experiments to conclude that a bilingual speaker’s brain must be in some way different from that of a monolingual speaker. The question is rather:...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Open Journal of Applied Sciences
سال: 2013
ISSN: 2165-3917,2165-3925
DOI: 10.4236/ojapps.2013.37050